revision-achieves-complete-trustworthiness
OUT derived (depth 9)
The revision system simultaneously achieves three independent trustworthiness properties: verifiable soundness (complete two-dimensional provenance/temporal coverage with reliable propagation), end-to-end reliability (across logical and infrastructure layers), and complete auditability (every correction leaves traceable history).
Summary
This claim says the revision system hits the full trifecta of trustworthiness — every correction can be traced, every dependency is tracked across both source and time dimensions, and reliability holds from the logic layer down to the infrastructure. It is currently unsupported because at least one of its foundations has a caveat: the soundness guarantee depends on an assumption about the dependents index that may not hold for all referenced nodes.
Justifications
SL — Verifiable soundness and reliability-with-auditability are established through different chains; soundness is gated on propagation correctness, which the combined claim inherits.
Antecedents (all must be IN):
- revision-coverage-is-verifiably-sound — Revision coverage spans the complete two-dimensional space (provenance axis and temporal axis) with end-to-end reliability across logical and infrastructure layers, forming a verifiably sound revision system — conditional on propagation not assuming the dependents index exists for all referenced nodes.
- revision-system-is-reliable-and-auditable — The revision system achieves two independent trustworthiness properties simultaneously: end-to-end reliability across logical and infrastructure layers with no blind spots, and complete auditability with traceable correction history spanning all belief origins.
Unless (any of these IN defeats this justification):
- propagate-assumes-dependents-exist — Every ID in `node.dependents` is accessed via `self.nodes[dep_id]` without a membership check; a dangling dependent reference will raise `KeyError` — this is intentional (broken invariant = bug)
Dependents
These beliefs depend on this one:
- origin-agnostic-trustworthiness-is-fully-verifiable — The system's complete revision trustworthiness holds identically across all belief origins and is independently verifiable through full maintenance loop observability — trustworthiness is not merely claimed but provable through origin-agnostic audit trails — provided propagation's dependents invariant holds.
- trustworthiness-is-verifiable-through-observability — The revision system's complete trustworthiness (verifiable soundness, end-to-end reliability, full auditability) is independently verifiable because the minimality-sustained maintenance loop provides complete observability — every self-correction and maintenance action leaves traceable evidence that can be inspected.