sl-outlist-asymmetry

IN premise

Missing antecedents invalidate a justification, but missing outlist nodes do not — this asymmetry enables "believe X unless Y" where Y may not yet exist in the network

Summary

When checking whether a conclusion is supported, the system treats missing supporters and missing defeaters differently. If a reason that supports a conclusion is missing, the conclusion fails. But if a potential defeater is missing, the conclusion still holds. This makes it possible to set up default reasoning — you can say "assume X is true unless something specifically contradicts it," and that works even before any contradicting evidence has been added to the system.

Dependents

These beliefs depend on this one:

Details

Sourceentries/2026/04/23/reasons_lib-network-_justification_valid.md