operational-profile-spans-all-backends
OUT derived (depth 11)
The safe, assured, resource-bounded operational profile holds identically across all storage backends — the same safety, assurance, and resource-efficiency guarantees apply uniformly to both SQLite and PostgreSQL deployments.
Summary
The system's guarantees around safety, reliability, and efficient resource use are claimed to apply equally whether running on SQLite or PostgreSQL, with no backend-specific gaps or trade-offs. This is currently retracted, meaning something in the supporting reasoning no longer holds — so uniform cross-backend guarantees cannot be assumed right now.
Justifications
SL — Operational profile universality gated on PostgreSQL API completeness — currently OUT because PgApi has partial coverage, flips IN when parity is achieved
Antecedents (all must be IN):
- operational-profile-is-safe-assured-and-resource-bounded — The system's complete operational profile achieves both safety (defense-in-depth reinforced across LLM and system boundaries with resource-efficient layered defenses) and assurance (spanning temporal self-correction, end-to-end reliability, and external control within efficient pipeline bounds) — neither safety nor assurance requires resource trade-offs against the other.
- safety-is-enforced-across-all-layers-and-backends — Safety is enforced uniformly across both the architectural dimension (clean layer boundaries with atomic isolated mutations) and the storage dimension (equivalent guarantees through backend-appropriate mechanisms in SQLite and PostgreSQL) — no safety property depends on a specific backend or architectural layer.
Unless (any of these IN defeats this justification):
- pgapi-partial-api-coverage — PgApi implements core operations (add/retract/assert/search/nogood/explain) but defers simulation, dialectics, namespace support, import/export, and maintenance operations to future work