safety-is-enforced-across-all-layers-and-backends

IN derived (depth 4)

Safety is enforced uniformly across both the architectural dimension (clean layer boundaries with atomic isolated mutations) and the storage dimension (equivalent guarantees through backend-appropriate mechanisms in SQLite and PostgreSQL) — no safety property depends on a specific backend or architectural layer.

Summary

The system's safety guarantees hold no matter which database you use or which architectural layer you look at. Clean boundaries between layers prevent corruption from spreading across components, atomic operations prevent partial updates within any single component, and both SQLite and PostgreSQL achieve these same properties through their own native mechanisms — so switching backends never quietly drops a safety guarantee.

Justifications

SL — Connects backend-agnostic storage safety with layer-enforced architectural safety into a cross-cutting safety invariant; storage-layer-is-backend-agnostic-and-safe is currently unused

Antecedents (all must be IN):

  • storage-layer-is-backend-agnostic-and-safe — Both storage backends provide equivalent safety guarantees through backend-appropriate mechanisms: atomic isolated mutations (context-managed load/save for SQLite, per-method transactions for PgApi) and safe hypothetical reasoning (write-flag gating for SQLite, transaction rollback for PgApi), making safety properties independent of backend choice.
  • architecture-enforces-structural-and-operational-safety — Architectural safety is enforced along two independent dimensions: structurally, the central network dependency is contained within clean three-layer boundaries preventing cross-layer corruption; operationally, every mutation path is atomic and isolated preventing within-layer partial state — neither dimension alone is sufficient, but together they eliminate both classes of corruption.

Dependents

These beliefs depend on this one:

Details